Published by the FinTech Association of Kenya
PRECURSORSubscribe
Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 4 Β· A WhatsApp group helped beat a KSh 40m tax bill.

𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘ͺ𝒂𝒔𝒆 π‘Ήπ’π’π’Ž: KRA taxed the money that passed through Francis Mugwi Kamau's accounts as if all of it were income. The Tax Appeals Tribunal ruled that a bank statement shows cash moving, and that KRA had to weigh his explanations for it.

By The Precursor Editorial Team, Tax and financial judgement Β· 5 min read,
Lecture 4 Β· A WhatsApp group helped beat a KSh 40m tax bill.

A WhatsApp group helped beat a KSh 40m tax bill.

You run several things at once. You broker construction materials, collecting money from clients and paying suppliers the same day. You sell pigs to two processors. You sell two cars. You run for Parliament, and supporters send campaign money. Then you marry, and friends and family send about KSh 8m towards the wedding.

Every one of those shillings passes through your personal accounts. KRA adds them up and sends a bill for KSh 40.4m. Which of those deposits were income? And what would you need to show a tribunal to prove it?

Continue reading

KES 49 for the rest of this piece.

About 878 more words, including the reasoning and what it means for operators. One payment, this piece, kept for good. No subscription and no renewal.

Sign in to buy for KES 49Google takes a moment, and your purchase stays with you.

The Precursor Editorial Team

Precursor is published by the FinTech Association of Kenya and exercises independent editorial judgement under the Editorial Independence Charter. This article is labelled Precursor Executive Classroom, which marks commercial material. Knowledge on Tax and financial judgement.

More on this system

Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 22 Β· Yarde Park bought maize from farmers without receipts

𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘ͺ𝒂𝒔𝒆 π‘Ήπ’π’π’Ž: A maize trader supplying a flour miller could not produce invoices for much of what it bought from smallholders. KRA disallowed 40% of its purchases and added VAT, for a KSh 593.5m bill. The Tribunal upheld it because the ledgers KRA asked for never arrived.

Tax and financial judgement Β· 3 min read Β· Paid

Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 21 Β· Premier Caterers sent its documents a week too late.

𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘ͺ𝒂𝒔𝒆 π‘Ήπ’π’π’Ž: A catering company lost most of a KSh 4.4m dispute because its bank deposits ran ahead of its declared sales and its expenses lacked proof of payment. Its further documents arrived seven days after KRA's decision, and nothing in the law let KRA look at them.

Tax and financial judgement Β· 4 min read Β· Paid

Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 20 Β· Harley Berry filed nil while its customers reported sales.

𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘ͺ𝒂𝒔𝒆 π‘Ήπ’π’π’Ž: A company filed nil VAT returns while its customers' withholding VAT certificates showed it was trading, and claimed input tax from suppliers who had declared far less. Asked for invoices, it asked instead for a flat 40% allowance. The Tribunal upheld KSh 317.9m.

Tax and financial judgement Β· 4 min read Β· Paid