Published by the FinTech Association of Kenya
PRECURSORSubscribe
Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 20 Β· Harley Berry filed nil while its customers reported sales.

𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘ͺ𝒂𝒔𝒆 π‘Ήπ’π’π’Ž: A company filed nil VAT returns while its customers' withholding VAT certificates showed it was trading, and claimed input tax from suppliers who had declared far less. Asked for invoices, it asked instead for a flat 40% allowance. The Tribunal upheld KSh 317.9m.

By The Precursor Editorial Team, Tax and financial judgement Β· 4 min read,
Lecture 20 Β· Harley Berry filed nil while its customers reported sales.

Precursor

The case

On 26 March 2025 KRA assessed Harley Berry Limited KSh 317,909,009 in additional VAT for 2022 to 2024. The company had filed nil returns for January to July 2022 although withholding VAT credits sat in the system against its PIN. When it filed amended returns in November 2023, it still did not declare the sales those credits represented.

On the input side, KRA found claims against suppliers who were nil filers, non-filers or not registered for VAT when the claims were made. In some cases Harley Berry had claimed more input tax from a single supplier than that supplier had declared in total sales.

Continue reading

KES 49 for the rest of this piece.

About 641 more words, including the reasoning and what it means for operators. One payment, this piece, kept for good. No subscription and no renewal.

Sign in to buy for KES 49Google takes a moment, and your purchase stays with you.

The Precursor Editorial Team

Precursor is published by the FinTech Association of Kenya and exercises independent editorial judgement under the Editorial Independence Charter. This article is labelled Precursor Executive Classroom, which marks commercial material. Knowledge on Tax and financial judgement.

More on this system

Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 12 Β· Savla would not say who his suppliers were

𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘ͺ𝒂𝒔𝒆 π‘Ήπ’π’π’Ž: Accused of using fake invoices, a trader refused KRA's requests for his suppliers' addresses, contacts and payment records, calling them unreasonable. He won at the Tribunal and lost in the High Court and the Court of Appeal.

Tax and financial judgement Β· 4 min read Β· Paid

Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 15 Β· Twenty days cost Coca-Cola KSh 69.8m of input VAT.

𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘ͺ𝒂𝒔𝒆 π‘Ήπ’π’π’Ž: Coca-Cola Beverages left January's input VAT out of its returns, then added it to an amended July return on the day July's return was due. The Tribunal held that the six-month window had closed on 31 July.

Tax and financial judgement Β· 4 min read Β· Paid

Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 18 Β· Osho Drapers’ paperwork could not settle KRA’s supplier questions.

𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘ͺ𝒂𝒔𝒆 π‘Ήπ’π’π’Ž: KRA said four of a textile importer's suppliers were missing traders. The company had invoices, delivery notes and receipts. But the receipts said cash and the invoices said cheque, and the company could not produce the bank records to settle which. Three courts upheld the assessment.

Tax and financial judgement Β· 4 min read Β· Paid