Published by the FinTech Association of Kenya
PRECURSORSubscribe
Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 12 Β· Savla would not say who his suppliers were

𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘ͺ𝒂𝒔𝒆 π‘Ήπ’π’π’Ž: Accused of using fake invoices, a trader refused KRA's requests for his suppliers' addresses, contacts and payment records, calling them unreasonable. He won at the Tribunal and lost in the High Court and the Court of Appeal.

By The Precursor Editorial Team, Tax and financial judgement Β· 4 min read,
Lecture 12 Β· Savla would not say who his suppliers were

Precursor

The case

In early 2018 KRA assessed Savla, a Kenyan trader, for KSh 5.7m in additional VAT for September 2014 to December 2017. It alleged missing-trader fraud: the goods had not existed, the invoices had been bought, and the money paid to the suppliers had found its way back to him.

He objected in May 2018 with invoices, delivery notes and payment records. In June KRA twice asked for the supplier details, his financial records, bank statements and evidence that the goods had entered his business and been sold. He did not supply them, did not explain why he could not, and told KRA the request was unreasonable. In July KRA confirmed the assessment.

Continue reading

KES 49 for the rest of this piece.

About 690 more words, including the reasoning and what it means for operators. One payment, this piece, kept for good. No subscription and no renewal.

Sign in to buy for KES 49Google takes a moment, and your purchase stays with you.

The Precursor Editorial Team

Precursor is published by the FinTech Association of Kenya and exercises independent editorial judgement under the Editorial Independence Charter. This article is labelled Precursor Executive Classroom, which marks commercial material. Knowledge on Tax and financial judgement.

More on this system

Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 1 Β· I&M defeated a KSh713 million tax claim by tracing the entry.

𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘ͺ𝒂𝒔𝒆 π‘Ήπ’π’π’Ž: The bank won by showing how a KSh1.31 billion adjustment moved between its accounts without producing income or a tax deduction. Its records were already before KRA. The dispute survived because the authority misread them.

Tax and financial judgement Β· 7 min read Β· Paid

Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 5 Β· Pesapal won its VAT case. Parliament changed the law.

𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘ͺ𝒂𝒔𝒆 π‘Ήπ’π’π’Ž: The High Court ruled that a payment company moving money for merchants supplies an exempt financial service. Ten months later, the Finance Act 2026 taxed that service.

Tax and financial judgement Β· 4 min read Β· Paid

Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 10 Β· Galaxy Tools bought from suppliers nobody could find.

𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘ͺ𝒂𝒔𝒆 π‘Ήπ’π’π’Ž: KRA found that ten of a company's suppliers had no premises, no trading history and almost no other customers, and had been paid in cash. The Tribunal said valid invoices were enough. The High Court said invoices only open the argument.

Tax and financial judgement Β· 5 min read Β· Paid